Daniel Moody on "Designing diagramming notations that work": the physics of notations

Daniel L. Moody from University of Twente gave a talk (and a full fledged tutorial) at OMG technical meeting in Reston, VA, on the principles for designing effective diagramming notations. His talk had this overall design:

(click to enlarge)

Daniel Moody wrote a famous paper on IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering titled:

IEEE TSE. November/December 2009 (vol. 35 no. 6). pp. 756-779

Program flow charts have been invented long time ago, in 1947.
Visual notations are effective communication tools because they rely on the highly parallel way of reasoning an processing signals of the human brain.
Therefore, they should be optimized for human mind processing. It’s not something that can be designed based on opinions. There are ways of measuring and proving results.
The measure of optimization is cognitive effectiveness. Effectiveness of existing notations is hampered by:

  • unclear goal of the notation
  • low attention to this aspect
  • lack of accepted design principles
Notations like ER diagrams expose significant flaws, but is accepted and preserved with no questions. UML has the same problem. In general, another point is that in current notations there is no motivation on why one choose one symbol or another for model elements. In other words, there is no rationale for design of notations. Basically, we are still in unselfconscious design culture (more or less the same as the way huts are built by primitive people: there are no architecture principles or books, the just build huts).
The same symbols are used again and again within the same language and across languages (e.g., think about the rectangle symbol).
There is lack of testing and principles. That’s why Moody proposes a set of objective principles based on scientific observation.
Out of that, he proposes a clear manifesto for design notations:
  1. At least equal effort and attention for notation and content
  2. Have a design rationale
  3. Decision must be based on evidence
  4. Design must be based on objective principles
  5. There must be explicit testing of the notations (user studies)

The purpose is to move diagramming from art to science.

To keep updated on my activities you can subscribe to the RSS feed of my blog or follow my twitter account (@MarcoBrambi).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s