I’ve been intrigued today by a bold tweet by Meinte Boersma (see his blog to know more about him and his activities)
Any sufficiently advanced software development methodology is indistinguishable from model-driven.
Meinte, I personally fully agree with you. Being also an advocate of Model driven development (and model driven in general, as this blog’s title demonstrates), this is not surprising at all.
This also opened up a new line of discussion, on whether MD* should be named a methodology at all or not.
Personally, I’m again with Meinte and I would say that MD* is much more than a bunch of tools. I think it is actually a methodology, or even more an overall way of thinking. If we want to delve into it: I think it’s a way to make explicit how we should think.
But real question as I see it is :
why can’t an advocate of any discipline state the same it for its own approach?
(e.g., development approaches like: Agile, Lean, test-based, search-based, …)
MDE is actually in a much better position, because it’s a way for formulating, stating and formalizing ways of thinking that are inherent with the human way of seeing the world (i.e., abstraction). That’s why MDE / MDD advocates can actually say that advanced software development methodology is indistinguishable from model-driven.
What’s your response?
Let’s discuss them all here!
[Incidentally, this is my post #100 on this blog! Thanks to all of you readers and contributors]